Comparison of Safety between Subclavian and Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization in patients admitted to the Medical ICU. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Ambreen Asif, Sabira Sharif, Kashif Aziz Ahmad, Samrah Fatima, Sohaib Akbar, Rabea Rashed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20231710279

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheterization (CVC) is a critical procedure in intensive care, most commonly performed via the subclavian or internal jugular veins. Each route has distinct advantages and complication risks, making site selection clinically important.

Objectives: To compare the safety profile, complication rates, and procedural outcomes of subclavian versus internal jugular CVC insertion in critically ill adults using real-time ultrasound guidance.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Medical Unit 3, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March 2022 to May 2023. A total of 100 adult patients requiring CVC for >48 hours were randomly assigned to the subclavian group (n = 50) or internal jugular group (n = 50). All insertions were performed under aseptic precautions and real-time ultrasound guidance. Primary outcomes were mechanical complications (pneumothorax, hemothorax, arterial puncture, malposition) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Secondary outcomes included insertion attempts, procedure time, and catheter malfunction. Data were analyzed using SPSS v26, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Baseline demographics and illness severity were similar in both groups. Pneumothorax occurred in 3 patients (6.0%) in the subclavian group versus none in the internal jugular group (p = 0.04). CRBSIs were significantly lower in the subclavian group (2 cases, 4.0%) compared to the internal jugular group (7 cases, 14.0%) (p = 0.03). Other complications, including arterial puncture (4.0% vs. 6.0%) and malposition (2.0% vs. 4.0%), were infrequent and comparable. First-attempt success rates were high in both groups (82.0% vs. 80.0%).

Conclusion: Both sites are safe with ultrasound guidance. The subclavian approach offers lower infection rates but a higher risk of pneumothorax, while the internal jugular site avoids pneumothorax but has increased infection risk.

Keywords: Central venous catheterization, subclavian vein, internal jugular vein, complications, ultrasound guidance.

Downloads

Crossmark - Check for Updates

How to Cite

Ambreen Asif, Sabira Sharif, Kashif Aziz Ahmad, Samrah Fatima, Sohaib Akbar, Rabea Rashed. (2023). Comparison of Safety between Subclavian and Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization in patients admitted to the Medical ICU. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 17(10), 279. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20231710279