Fluid Preloading Versus Ephedrine in the Management of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in patients undergoing Cesarean Delivery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs02024181302Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of prophylactic ephedrine versus fluid preload (Hartmann’s solution) in preventing hypotension in women undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at a teaching hospital
Methodology: Study was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology at Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad from January 2023 to September 2023. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B) using a draw method, where they selected sealed envelopes marked A or B. Group A received prophylactic ephedrine (0.25 mg/kg intravenous infusion immediately after bupivacaine injection), while Group B received prophylactic fluid preload (20 mL/kg Hartmann’s solution over 10–15 minutes before spinal anesthesia).
Results: The study enrolled a total of 62 patients, equally divided into Group A and Group B, with 31 patients in each group. The two groups were comparable in terms of age (32.32 ± 5.62 years in Group A vs. 30.35 ± 3.31 years in Group B, p = 0.197) and BMI (26.96 ± 2.88 kg/m² in Group A vs. 27.03 ± 3.31 kg/m² in Group B, p = 0.964). In terms of efficacy, Group A demonstrated a significantly higher success rate compared to Group B (67.7% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.022).
Conclusion: The frequency of hypotension is lower in women receiving prophylactic ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section compared to those given a Hartmann’s solution preload.
Keywords: Spinal anesthesia, Fluid preload, Hypotension, Ephedrine, Cesarean section.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Asad Khan, Maqsood Ahmed Siddiqui, Hira Asad, Shahid Hussain, Muhammad Taqi, Kelash Kumar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
