Comparison of Outcome of Lateral Pinning Versus Medial and Lateral Cross Pinning in Childhood Supracondylar Fractures of Humerus
Mudassar Nazzar, Muhammad Adeel-Ur-Rehman, Rizwan Anwar, Omer Farooq Tanveer, Muhammad Abdul Hanan, Muhammad Arif
2873
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To compare the complications
and outcomes of lateral entry pin fixation with medial and lateral pin fixation
for Gartland type III supracondylar fractures of humerus.
Methodology: This prospective comparative study involving 190 patients
of Gartland type III close supracondylar fractures were included. from
March-2019 to Dec-2020. In all patients, initially the elbow was mobilized
using the splint placed above the elbow joint at 30 to 45 degrees’ flexion.
After closed reduction, lateral pinning was applied in group I and in group II
lateral and medial cross pinning was applied using the standard protocol.
Patients were followed for iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, radiologic and
function outcomes in-terms of loss of reduction, elbow range of motion, loss in
carrying angle and functional outcomes.
Results: The two
groups were comparable for loss of elbow range of motion, loss of carrying
angle and loss of Bauman's angle. On clinical examination, immediate post-operative
ulnar nerve injury was diagnosed in 4 (4.2%) cases in group II and in no
patient in group I (p-value 0.12). Satisfactory functional outcomes were
achieved in 85 (89.5%) patients in group I and in 88 (92.6%) patients in group
II (p-value 0.44).
Conclusion: Lateral pinning provided stable fixation clinically and
radiologically as compared to lateral and medial cross pinning.
Keywords: Supracondylar
fracture of Humerus, Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, Lateral pin entry, lateral
and medial cross pin entry.