Dentist’s Perspective Regarding Usage of Different Fixed Prosthesis Removal Systems in Islamabad and Rawalpindi
Parivash Anwar, Aafia Waheed, Adnan Munir Raja, Muhammad Shakeel Akram Khawaja, Sidra Kazmi, Ittrat Haider
3182
ABSTRAT
Background: Crowns and multi-unit fixed partial dentures
have a limited lifetime. They fail for a number of reasons. The removal of
provisional crowns and bridges is generally simple, however for permanent crowns, it becomes more
challenging. Careful removal of FPD can help a dentist simplify a resto or endo
procedure. The aim of this article was to analyze the different methods
available for the removal of crowns and bridges and their awareness among
dental practitioners
Study Design &
location: This
was a cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire. The questionnaire was
filled by a total of 250 general and specialist dentists who were practicing in
various individual and group-based dental practices as well as private and
government setups of Islamabad and Rawalpindi.
Methodology: The questionnaire comprised
a total of 13 questions to find out dentists' views about the usage of
different system’s available for dental crowns and FPD removal. Participants
were selected by random sampling. The results were then analyzed using SPSS
version 23. Frequencies, percentages of different variables used in the study
were calculated to identify the co-relation among different attributes. P-value
of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The study reflected that
out of those who answered, 247 dental professionals (98.5 %) preferred using
hemostats or Morrell sliding hammer or a combination of both as they offered
better control of force. A small percentage (approx 2%) of dentists used
diamond or carbide burs as their first
preference to trim off old crowns. Clinicians rarely used laser due to its high
cost and less availability and its effectiveness primarily related to Porcelain
jacket/ Zirconium crowns.
Conclusion: It was concluded from this
study that the majority of dentists preferred Morrell type crown remover with
sliding hammer due to its ease of availability, universal acceptance, simple to
use and because as it offered better control of force as opposed to spring-lock
type
Keywords: Crown and bridge removal,
Crown and bridge disassembly, Crown and bridge failure.