Comparison of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Vs Traditional Rehabilitation Therapy to Improve Upper Limb Function in Hemiplegic Acute and Subacute Stroke Patients
Misbah Waris, Adnan Afzal, Tehreem Mukhtar, Binash Afzal, Sadaf Waris, Qurat-Ul-Ain
3021
ABSTRACT
Background: Stroke is a
generic term in use to describe the sudden interruption of blood flow to the
part of brain, resulting loss of brain function. A stroke may be also known as
cerebrovascular accident. Cerebrovascular accident which defines as pathology
in which brain disease occurs secondary to disorders of blood supply of brain.
It is essential to know about the magnitude of impact of stroke globally.
Aim: To determine
effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy and comparing its efficacy
to traditional rehabilitation in acute and sub-acute stroke survivors
exhibiting upper limb hemiplegia
Methodology: This was a
randomized clinical trial study, conducted in Lahore in which eighteen stroke
patients had participated. Current study
includes
Results: Statistical analysis was set at p ≤
0.05. huge and direct to vast impacts existed on WMFT (P=0.010) noteworthy and
direct to extensive impacts existed When p-value is not as much as the
foreordained importance level which is frequently 0.05 or 0.01, showing that
the watched results would be profoundly impossible under the alternate theory.
In this way, the alternate hypothesis was supported. Subsequently null
hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted.
Conclusion: This study
concluded that the patients who were treated with CIMT showed remarkable change
in upper extremity functions. While patients who were treated with traditional
rehabilitation therapy they exhibited less change in their functional
activities than Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy.
Keywords: Comparison,
traditional rehabilitation therapy, Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT)
Approaches,