Comparison of Efficacy of Ceftriaxone Alone or Combination with Metronidazole in Prevention of Wound Infection in Elective Cesarean Section
Iqra Arshad, Rizwana Nawaz, Tehmina Naz
816
ABSTRACT
Background: Wound infection is a common complication after cesarean section. However,
certain antibiotics, if given before closing wound, the Wound infection can be
prevented. So we conducted this trial to determine the benefit of two
antibiotics in prevention of post-cesarean wound infection.
Aim: To compare
the efficacy with prophylaxis ceftriaxone versus ceftriaxone plus metronidazole
in patients undergoing planned cesarean section.
Methods: This Randomized
controlled trial (experimental study) was done at Department of Obstetrics and
gynecology, Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital, Gujrat for 6 months. The patients
were recruited by applying non-probability consecutive sampling technique. The
patients were divided randomly in 2 groups of equal number of cases. In group
A, patients were given IV ceftriaxone as single dose of 1g before skin incision.
In group B, patients were given IV ceftriaxone 500mg plus IV metronidazole
500mg before skin incision. Then patients underwent cesarean section under
spinal anesthesia. Patients were followed-up for 10 days. If there was no sign
of infection at wound site, then efficacy was labeled.
Results: In
ceftriaxone group, average age of patients was 30.36±6.84 years and in
combination group, patients had mean age of 29.10±6.95 years. All patients
presented within 38-42 weeks of gestation. Efficacy was achieved in 84% cases
with ceftriaxone while in 78% in combination group. Statistically there was no significant
difference detected between both groups i.e. (p 0.279).
Conclusion: Thus, there is no difference in efficacy in both groups, so we can
implement the use of ceftriaxone alone instead of combination with
metronidazole.
Keywords: Wound
infection, Lower segment cesarean section, Prophylaxis, Ceftriaxone,
metronidazole.
ABSTRACT
Background: Wound infection is a common complication after cesarean section. However,
certain antibiotics, if given before closing wound, the Wound infection can be
prevented. So we conducted this trial to determine the benefit of two
antibiotics in prevention of post-cesarean wound infection.
Aim: To compare
the efficacy with prophylaxis ceftriaxone versus ceftriaxone plus metronidazole
in patients undergoing planned cesarean section.
Methods: This Randomized
controlled trial (experimental study) was done at Department of Obstetrics and
gynecology, Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital, Gujrat for 6 months. The patients
were recruited by applying non-probability consecutive sampling technique. The
patients were divided randomly in 2 groups of equal number of cases. In group
A, patients were given IV ceftriaxone as single dose of 1g before skin incision.
In group B, patients were given IV ceftriaxone 500mg plus IV metronidazole
500mg before skin incision. Then patients underwent cesarean section under
spinal anesthesia. Patients were followed-up for 10 days. If there was no sign
of infection at wound site, then efficacy was labeled.
Results: In
ceftriaxone group, average age of patients was 30.36±6.84 years and in
combination group, patients had mean age of 29.10±6.95 years. All patients
presented within 38-42 weeks of gestation. Efficacy was achieved in 84% cases
with ceftriaxone while in 78% in combination group. Statistically there was no significant
difference detected between both groups i.e. (p 0.279).
Conclusion: Thus, there is no difference in efficacy in both groups, so we can
implement the use of ceftriaxone alone instead of combination with
metronidazole.
Keywords: Wound
infection, Lower segment cesarean section, Prophylaxis, Ceftriaxone,
metronidazole.