Comparison Between Saphenous Vein Graft and Radial Artery Graft in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Malik Salman, Syed Sardar Rahim, Ahmad Kamran Khan, Furqan Yaqub Pannu, Bilal Ahmed, Shahid Iqbal, S. Afshan, Amna Shafqat
3378
ABSTRACT
Background: To bypass the obstruction in
native coronary arteries both arterial and venous grafts are used. Inspite of
having radial artery graft as a favored second conduit for bypass, venous
grafts are more frequently used.
Objective: To compare the CT angiography patency
findings of radial artery graft vs. saphenous vein graft 3 months
postoperatively.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: The study was conductedat the Department of
Cardiac Surgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore.
Data Collection: All patients fulfilling theinclusioncriteria were
recruited. A written informed consentwastaken. The non-dominant arm was used
almostexclusively forharvesting the radial artery in those patients who have
positive modified Allen`s test as a pedicle by atraumatic "no-touch" technique.
After heparanization, it was immersed in diluted solution (Inj. verapamil
hydrochloride 5mg + Inj. nitroglycerin 2.5mg + Inj. heparin 500 IU + Inj. ringer
lactate 300 ml with Inj. 8.4% NaHCO3 0.9 m1). All the patients in the study
received LIMA to LAD and were done on pump. After that the patients were
dividedinto2 groups namely Group I and Group II by computer generated method.
In Group I, the patient received the radial artery as a second graft to a
coronary having more than 90% stenosis. The third or fourth graft if required
is saphenous vein graft. The group II had SVG as second, third or fourth
grafts, one of the venous grafts were to a coronary having more than 90%
stenosis.
Results: Average age of all (n=62) patients was
38.82±9.93 years. Average age in Group-I & II patients was 39.09±9.49 &
38.54±10.50 years respectively. Among patients 47% were male and 53% were
female patients. In Group-I, 12 (38.7%) of the patients were male, and 19
(67.3%) were female, whereas in Group-II, 17 (54.8%) of the patients were male,
and 14 (45.8%) were female. In Group-I 1(3.2%) patient and in Group-II 3(9.7%)
patients died (p=0.301). Insignificant difference was seen for cardiac
arrhythmias i.e. Group-I:16.1% vs. Group-II: 19.4%, p=0.740. Myocardial
infarction in Group-A 5(16.1%) patients and in Group-B 7(22.6%) (p=0.520). In
Group-A, 30(96.8%) patients and in Group-B, 28(90.3%) patients showed patency
of artery after coronary artery bypass grafting(P>0.05).
Conclusion:
We discovered no significant difference in
the patency of both radial artery and saphenous vein grafts on 3 months
postoperative CT angiography and clinical outcomes in terms of perioperative
mortality, MI, and cardiac arrhythmias in patients who underwent CABG in this
study.
Keywords: radial artery graft, saphenous vein graft, coronary artery bypass
grafting, Myocardial Infarction, Mortality, Cardiac arrhythmias