Limberg Flap Versus Primary Midline Wound Closure in Treatment of Chronic Pilonidal Sinus Disease
Naeem Ghaffar, Muhammad Aslam Javed, Farooq Ahmad, Hina Khan, Muhammad Arshad, Kamran Khalid Khawaja
219
ABSTRACT
Objective: Current
study aims to compare the Limberg flap technique with primary midline wound
closure to treat the chronic pilonidal sinus disease.
Study design: A comparative study was done in Surgery
Department Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Lahore from January 2020 to September 2021
Method: The sample
size for the study is 60 patients who
were regularly visiting the hospital due to PS disease. All the patients were
divided into two groups A and B. Group A had 30 patients treated with the Limberg flap method and group B had 30 patients
treated with primary midline wound closure. Before starting the treatment a
brief description of the
treatment was given to all patients and consent was signed from all
participants. The final decision
for treatment was decided by the team of senior surgeons as well as with
help of the patient's own choice. Limberg flap and
primary midline wound closure (PMC) were applied to patients who regularly followed the instruction for chronic
pilonidal sinus treatment. Primary midline closure was applied on patients who had a cosmetic concern and did not have a recurrence problem.
Results: Total 60 patients were divided into two groups, Group A (Limberg flap) had 30 patients in which 25 (83%) were males and 5 (16.6%) females. The mean age for
this group was 25 ± 5.00 years. The patients without a previous history of pilonidal sinus disease
(primary case) was 17 (56.6%) and the recurrence case was 13 (14.3%). Group B (primary midline wound closure)
had 30 patients in which 18 (60%) were males and 12 (40%) females. The mean age for this group was 28 ± 3.00
years. The patient without a
previous history of pilonidal sinus disease (primary case) was 28 (93.3%) and the
recurrence case was 2 (6.6%). The
comparison of 3rd-week outcomes
shows that in group A 25 (83,3%) patients had painless walking, 23 (76.6%)
patients start their routine
work and 26 (86.6%) patients had treatment satisfaction. In group B 21 (70%) patients reported
painless walking, 18 (60%) patients
started their routine activity and 22 (73.3%) patients shows satisfaction with treatment.
Conclusion: Hence we concluded that a better improvement percentage
was measured high in group A (Limberg flap) than group B (PMC). Therefore limberg
flap is better technique to treat the chronic pilonidal sinus disease.
Keywords: chronic Pilonidal Sinus, primary midline wound
closure (PMC), Limberg flap
ABSTRACT
Objective: Current
study aims to compare the Limberg flap technique with primary midline wound
closure to treat the chronic pilonidal sinus disease.
Study design: A comparative study was done in Surgery
Department Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Lahore from January 2020 to September 2021
Method: The sample
size for the study is 60 patients who
were regularly visiting the hospital due to PS disease. All the patients were
divided into two groups A and B. Group A had 30 patients treated with the Limberg flap method and group B had 30 patients
treated with primary midline wound closure. Before starting the treatment a
brief description of the
treatment was given to all patients and consent was signed from all
participants. The final decision
for treatment was decided by the team of senior surgeons as well as with
help of the patient's own choice. Limberg flap and
primary midline wound closure (PMC) were applied to patients who regularly followed the instruction for chronic
pilonidal sinus treatment. Primary midline closure was applied on patients who had a cosmetic concern and did not have a recurrence problem.
Results: Total 60 patients were divided into two groups, Group A (Limberg flap) had 30 patients in which 25 (83%) were males and 5 (16.6%) females. The mean age for
this group was 25 ± 5.00 years. The patients without a previous history of pilonidal sinus disease
(primary case) was 17 (56.6%) and the recurrence case was 13 (14.3%). Group B (primary midline wound closure)
had 30 patients in which 18 (60%) were males and 12 (40%) females. The mean age for this group was 28 ± 3.00
years. The patient without a
previous history of pilonidal sinus disease (primary case) was 28 (93.3%) and the
recurrence case was 2 (6.6%). The
comparison of 3rd-week outcomes
shows that in group A 25 (83,3%) patients had painless walking, 23 (76.6%)
patients start their routine
work and 26 (86.6%) patients had treatment satisfaction. In group B 21 (70%) patients reported
painless walking, 18 (60%) patients
started their routine activity and 22 (73.3%) patients shows satisfaction with treatment.
Conclusion: Hence we concluded that a better improvement percentage
was measured high in group A (Limberg flap) than group B (PMC). Therefore limberg
flap is better technique to treat the chronic pilonidal sinus disease.
Keywords: chronic Pilonidal Sinus, primary midline wound
closure (PMC), Limberg flap