Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin Among High-Risk Patients with Dyslipidaemia
Muhammad Ayyaz, Hammad Ur Rehman Bhatti, Ahsan Ayub
683
ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this analysis
was to compare the effectiveness of rosuvastatin in lowering cholesterol with
that of atorvastatin in patients at high risk of dyslipidaemia.
Place and Duration: In the Medicine department
of Islam Medical College and Teaching
Hospital Sialkot
for six months duration from June 2021 to November 2021.
Methods: This randomized,
open-label study enrolled 90 patients with high-risk dyslipidaemia and
diagnosed according to the international guidelines for the prevention of adult
dyslipidaemia. These patients were randomized to rosuvastatin and atorvastatin to
receive rosuvastatin 20 mg / day and atorvastatin 20 mg / day, respectively,
for three months. In both groups, the efficacy of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin
on the concentration of LDL-C, HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides
(TG) was assessed. In addition, the rates of achieving LDL-C or TC target
levels were assessed in both groups.
Results: Rosuvastatin caused a
significantly greater reduction of LDL-C (43.2% and 38.1%, p <0.05) and TC (34.8%
Vs 28.1%, p <0.05) than Atorvastatin. In addition, the percentage of subjects
attaining the recommended target TC and LDL-C levels was higher in the group of
rosuvastatin as compared to the atorvastatin group.
Conclusions: In patients at high
risk of hyperlipidemia, rosuvastatin has high efficacy in decreasing lipids
than atorvastatin.
Keywords: rosuvastatin,
atorvastatin, dyslipidaemia, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides.
ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this analysis
was to compare the effectiveness of rosuvastatin in lowering cholesterol with
that of atorvastatin in patients at high risk of dyslipidaemia.
Place and Duration: In the Medicine department
of Islam Medical College and Teaching
Hospital Sialkot
for six months duration from June 2021 to November 2021.
Methods: This randomized,
open-label study enrolled 90 patients with high-risk dyslipidaemia and
diagnosed according to the international guidelines for the prevention of adult
dyslipidaemia. These patients were randomized to rosuvastatin and atorvastatin to
receive rosuvastatin 20 mg / day and atorvastatin 20 mg / day, respectively,
for three months. In both groups, the efficacy of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin
on the concentration of LDL-C, HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides
(TG) was assessed. In addition, the rates of achieving LDL-C or TC target
levels were assessed in both groups.
Results: Rosuvastatin caused a
significantly greater reduction of LDL-C (43.2% and 38.1%, p <0.05) and TC (34.8%
Vs 28.1%, p <0.05) than Atorvastatin. In addition, the percentage of subjects
attaining the recommended target TC and LDL-C levels was higher in the group of
rosuvastatin as compared to the atorvastatin group.
Conclusions: In patients at high
risk of hyperlipidemia, rosuvastatin has high efficacy in decreasing lipids
than atorvastatin.
Keywords: rosuvastatin,
atorvastatin, dyslipidaemia, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides.