Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1st Molar
Muhammad Junaid Hashmi, Atiq ur Rahman, Muhammad Athar Khan, Muhammad Azeem Khan, Shamima Abdullah, Hafiz M. Shahzad
285
ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine anesthetic
efficacy of single buccal infiltration of 4% articaine and 2% lignocaine in
extraction of maxillary 1st molar.
Study Settings: This study was carried
out at The Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Bakhtawar Amin
Medical and Dental College, Multan from March 2021 to August 2021.
Material and Methods: Patients were divided
in two groups randomly Articaine HCl. 4% with Epinephrine 1:100,000 injection
and Lignocaine HCl. 2% and Epinephrine 1:100,000 injection. Buccal infiltration
was given in the area between the two molar buccal roots, along the long axis.
One person carried out all injections by using slow injection method (roughly
1ml/min) and deposited full cartridge (1.8ml of solution). 4% articaine or 2%
lignocaine was used on each patient when extraction was performed however in
cartridges labeled 1 to 100 with the use of suitable blinding technique.
Results of the Study: VAS scores after injection of lignocaine were:
mild for 5 patients (10%), moderate for 34 patients (68%), and severe for 11
patients (22%), while none of the patients reported with no pain after
lignocaine injection. The mean pain experienced by patients on VAS, after
extraction using articaine was 2.70 ± 1.91 and VAS after extraction using
lignocaine was 2.58 ± 1.94.
Conclusion: It was concluded that during articaine single buccal
injection observed pain is significantly less in contrast to combined buccal
and palatal lignocaine injection..
Keywords: Single buccal
infiltration, articaine, lignocaine, maxillary 1st molar