Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh Repair for Para-Umbilical Hernia
Muhammad Khurram Zia, Sarmad Younis, Aqeel Ashraf, Shahid Khan Afridi, Fazli Subhan, Muhammad Attique Sadiq
1112
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between onlay
mesh technique and sublay mesh technique in patients undergoing paraumbilical
hernia repair.
Study Design: Retrospective/Observational
Place & Duration: In the department of surgery, Muhammad
Teaching Hospital, Peshawar and Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi and
conducted during the period from March
2021 to August 2021.
Methods: A total of 166 patients with both genders
having ages 18 to 65 years who were undergoing para-umbilical hernia repair
were included. Patients demographic including age, gender were recorded after
informed consent. Patients were equally divided into two groups Group O and
Group S. Group O (83 patients) received onlay mesh technique and Group S (83
patients) received sublay technique. Outcomes such as post-operative pain,
wound infection, seroma formation and hospital stay were recorded and compare
the results between both groups.
Results: In group O 48 (57.83%) patients and in group
S 47 (56.63%) patients were females while 35 (42.17%) and 36 (43.37%) patients
were males in group O and S. There was significant difference in term of
post-operative pain 6.01+2.26 vs 3.58+1.44 (P-value <0.05). In group O 14
(16.87%) patients and in group S 4 (4.82%) patients had wound infection. 8
(9.64%) patients in Group O and 2 (2.40%) patients in Group S had seroma. Mean
Hospital stay in days was high in Group O compared to Group B 5.32+1.74 vs 2.46+1.38
days (p=<0.05). There was a statistical significant difference regarding
efficacy between both procedures with p-value 0.036.
Conclusion: We concluded that sublay mesh technique for para-umbilical
hernia repair was safe and effective with very low rate of complications as
compared to onlay mesh procedure.
Keywords: Paraumbilical Hernia Repair, Onlay Mesh
Technique, Sublay Mesh Technique, Outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between onlay
mesh technique and sublay mesh technique in patients undergoing paraumbilical
hernia repair.
Study Design: Retrospective/Observational
Place & Duration: In the department of surgery, Muhammad
Teaching Hospital, Peshawar and Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi and
conducted during the period from March
2021 to August 2021.
Methods: A total of 166 patients with both genders
having ages 18 to 65 years who were undergoing para-umbilical hernia repair
were included. Patients demographic including age, gender were recorded after
informed consent. Patients were equally divided into two groups Group O and
Group S. Group O (83 patients) received onlay mesh technique and Group S (83
patients) received sublay technique. Outcomes such as post-operative pain,
wound infection, seroma formation and hospital stay were recorded and compare
the results between both groups.
Results: In group O 48 (57.83%) patients and in group
S 47 (56.63%) patients were females while 35 (42.17%) and 36 (43.37%) patients
were males in group O and S. There was significant difference in term of
post-operative pain 6.01+2.26 vs 3.58+1.44 (P-value <0.05). In group O 14
(16.87%) patients and in group S 4 (4.82%) patients had wound infection. 8
(9.64%) patients in Group O and 2 (2.40%) patients in Group S had seroma. Mean
Hospital stay in days was high in Group O compared to Group B 5.32+1.74 vs 2.46+1.38
days (p=<0.05). There was a statistical significant difference regarding
efficacy between both procedures with p-value 0.036.
Conclusion: We concluded that sublay mesh technique for para-umbilical
hernia repair was safe and effective with very low rate of complications as
compared to onlay mesh procedure.
Keywords: Paraumbilical Hernia Repair, Onlay Mesh Technique, Sublay Mesh Technique, Outcomes.