Comparison of two Different Surgical Modalities in the treatment of Pilonidal Sinus (Primary Closure and Open Technique)
Muhammad Aamir Jamil, Muhammad Imran Anwar, Muhammad Waqas Saleem, Sameen Tahir, Haroon Javaid Majid
2999
ABSTRACT
Background:
Pilonidal
sinus is disease of young age andits prevalence is higher in men compared to
women (almost twice).It is a disease that arises from hair follicles
particularly present in the natal cleft. It occurs commonly in Jeep Drivers and
hence gets the name from there “Jeep Drivers Disease” and also commonly occurs
in Barbers. It leads to formation of abscesses and chronic wounds with
discharge and pain. Disease can have huge impact on social life and quality of
life. In most cases the treatment is incision and drainage.
Study design:
It is
a case series study.
Place and
duration of study: Department
of General Surgery at Shaikh Zayed Hospital Lahore from January 2019 to January
2021.
Aim: To compare the
relative effects of open and closed surgical techniques on the recurrence rate,
rate of infection and time of healing for pilonidal sinus.
Methodology: Patients with
pilonidal sinus disease from January 2019 to January 2021 received surgical
treatment either excision followed by primary closure as in closed technique
(group A) or excision followed by leaving the wound open for healing by
secondary intention as in open technique (group B). Surgical management is
widely based upon two techniques open and closed. In open technique wound is
left open and heals by secondary intention while in closed technique it is
closed primarily and heals by primary intention. The better choice between
these two techniques is still a topic of debate.
Results:
The
most common age group for pilonidal sinus was between 16-25 years of age. The
mean age came out to be 26.7 years. The mean healing time was 15 days in group
A and 42 days in group B. The duration of hospital stay ranged between 2-8 days
for group A and 5-16 days for group B. Early postoperative complications seen
was infection in 1 patient (7.69%) in group A and 5 patients (35.71%) in group
B and these cases were managed conservatively.1 (7.69%) case of aseptic gaping
of wound after stitch removal was seen in group A and was managed with closed
technique. Recurrences reported in group A was 1 case (7.69%) at 6 months and
was surgically managed by open technique. There were a total of 4 (28.57%)
recurrences which were left open to heal by granulation.
Conclusion:
It is
concluded that better management option for pilonidal sinus disease is primary
closure of defect. So it is suggested that management of pilonidal sinus
disease should be individualized but preference must be given to closure of
wound after excision.
Keywords:
Pilonidal
sinus, Primary Closure, Open Technique.