Background: Anterior cruciate ligament rupture is one of the most common problems in active people, especially

athletes with complications of pain and inflammation and knee instability. The most important treatment for this

damage is reconstruction of torn ligaments, which is done with an alternate graft. These grafts have different

tAyipmes: .T o assess the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft and allograft and compare them.

Methods: In this study, 75 patients who referred to the Clinic of Firoozgar Hospital for the reconstruction of

anterior cruciate ligament between the years of 2015-2017 and who had the characteristics of entering the study

were selected and then divided into two groups: autograft (44) and allograft (31)) and surgery was performed by a

surgeon and the results of the surgery were evaluated using IKDC questionnaire, KT stability arthrometer, Pivot

sRheisftu teltsst: a6n7d pLaaticehnmtsa wn eteres t.M ale and 8 patients were female. The mean age of the participants was 31 years, and

the mean BMI was 24. The mean follow-up time was 28 months. The average score obtained with the IKDC

questionnaire was 76.16 in allograft group and 79.61 in autograft group, the average displacement in examination

with KT1000 arthrometer was 3.7 mm and 3.65 mm, and in 20 patient LACHMANT test were positive (>5mm), 8

PIVOT shift test were positive (3 Autogarft vs 5 Allograft). There was no significant statistical difference between

ACuotnocglruasfti oann:d TAhlloeg rreacfte gnrto usptusd eyx cdeepmt oinn sdteramteodg rathpahti ct hined eaxnetesr i(oarg ec rauncdia tBeM lIig).a ment reconstruction has favorable

results, and if the selection conditions are the same, there is no statistically significant difference in the clinical

responses between the two types of grafts, which indicates efficacy of both surgical procedures are clinically

rKeeleyv wanotr. ds: Anterior cruciate ligament, Allograft, Autograft.