A Psychometric Assessment of Structural Empowerment Scale for Public Health Nurses (SES PHN)
Jestoni d. Maniago
960
ABSTRACT
Aim: To develop a
structural empowerment assessment scale for public health nurses and examined
its psychometric properties and utility in predicting organizational commitment
and job satisfaction.
Methods: Deductive scale development was employed. A total of 206
public health nurses from Central Luzon, Philippines who met the eligibility
criteria were recruited as respondents. Content validity index (CVI) and
exploratory factor analysis(EFA)were used in the analysis of data.
Results: Only 18 out of 20
items received relevance rating of 3 and 4 by all experts and has excellent CVI
result. Sixteen out of the 18 items received CVI=1 and the 2 remaining items
received a rating of CVI=.83. Two out of 20 items received poor interpretation
of CVI with 0.5 and 0.33 CVI results. Moreover,
EFA revealed that 14 items in factor 1 has larger loading than the factor 2. There
will be 14 items to factor 1 and factor 2 will consist of 3 items. Factor 1
received a Cronbach’s alpha result of .957 and .826 for factor 2, indicating
that both factors are acceptably reliable.
Conclusion: The developed Structural Empowerment Scale
for public health nurses (SES PHN) was valid and reliable. However, each factor
could probably be strengthened through revision of items with lower primary
loadings and possibly adding new items.
Keywords: Behavior
mechanism; motivation; reliability; testing; validity
ABSTRACT
Aim: To develop a
structural empowerment assessment scale for public health nurses and examined
its psychometric properties and utility in predicting organizational commitment
and job satisfaction.
Methods: Deductive scale development was employed. A total of 206
public health nurses from Central Luzon, Philippines who met the eligibility
criteria were recruited as respondents. Content validity index (CVI) and
exploratory factor analysis(EFA)were used in the analysis of data.
Results: Only 18 out of 20
items received relevance rating of 3 and 4 by all experts and has excellent CVI
result. Sixteen out of the 18 items received CVI=1 and the 2 remaining items
received a rating of CVI=.83. Two out of 20 items received poor interpretation
of CVI with 0.5 and 0.33 CVI results. Moreover,
EFA revealed that 14 items in factor 1 has larger loading than the factor 2. There
will be 14 items to factor 1 and factor 2 will consist of 3 items. Factor 1
received a Cronbach’s alpha result of .957 and .826 for factor 2, indicating
that both factors are acceptably reliable.
Conclusion: The developed Structural Empowerment Scale
for public health nurses (SES PHN) was valid and reliable. However, each factor
could probably be strengthened through revision of items with lower primary
loadings and possibly adding new items.
Keywords: Behavior
mechanism; motivation; reliability; testing; validity