Comparison of Magnesium Sulfate and Nifedipine for the Management of Preterm Labour
Jaweria Faisal, Sadia Kanwal, Fatima Chaudhry Inayat, Zobia Jawad, Nargis Shabana, Iqra Zafar
534
ABSTRACT
Aim: To determine the
efficacy of Magnesium sulfate and Nifedipine in preterm labour management and
compare safety of both by finding frequency of their side effects.
Study design:
Randomized
control trial.
Place and
duration: Mother
and Child Health Unit II, Pakistan Institute of Medical sciences Islamabad,
from 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2011.
Methodology: The sixty patients
with confirmed diagnosis of preterm labor were randomly allocated to Group A
(Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4)) and Group B (Nifedipine). The primary outcome
measure was efficacy meaning more time duration gained in number of hours
(days) till delivery secondary outcomes was safety assessed by less side
effects.
Results:
Maternal
demographic features were similar in both groups. Average time gained in
delaying delivery by nifedipine was more than magnesium sulphate (6.2 vs. 5.8
days) with p value of 0.04, signifying its better efficacy. Regarding safety,
manypatients complained of multiple side effects in MgSO4 group such as burning
at injection site in 18(60%), dry mouth 17(56.6%) and headache in 16(53.3%)
patients but flushing was most common, occurred in 20(80%) patient. Many
patients felt dizziness, sweating and nausea, 9(30%), 6(20%) and 5(16.6%)
respectively. Majority of patients were free of side effects in nifedipine
group but headache was felt in 18(60%) ,tachycardia occurred in 12(40%)followed
by hypotension in 8(26.6%) patients.Only 2(6.6%) patients had nausea. Flushing
and dizziness were experienced only by 1, 1 (3.3%) patients
Conclusion: Nifedipine was
better in efficacy and safety than MgSO4 and caused less side effects
Keywords: Nifedipine,
Magnesium sulphate, Preterm labour, Tocolytic therapy, Management,
ABSTRACT
Aim: To determine the
efficacy of Magnesium sulfate and Nifedipine in preterm labour management and
compare safety of both by finding frequency of their side effects.
Study design:
Randomized
control trial.
Place and
duration: Mother
and Child Health Unit II, Pakistan Institute of Medical sciences Islamabad,
from 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2011.
Methodology: The sixty patients
with confirmed diagnosis of preterm labor were randomly allocated to Group A
(Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4)) and Group B (Nifedipine). The primary outcome
measure was efficacy meaning more time duration gained in number of hours
(days) till delivery secondary outcomes was safety assessed by less side
effects.
Results:
Maternal
demographic features were similar in both groups. Average time gained in
delaying delivery by nifedipine was more than magnesium sulphate (6.2 vs. 5.8
days) with p value of 0.04, signifying its better efficacy. Regarding safety,
manypatients complained of multiple side effects in MgSO4 group such as burning
at injection site in 18(60%), dry mouth 17(56.6%) and headache in 16(53.3%)
patients but flushing was most common, occurred in 20(80%) patient. Many
patients felt dizziness, sweating and nausea, 9(30%), 6(20%) and 5(16.6%)
respectively. Majority of patients were free of side effects in nifedipine
group but headache was felt in 18(60%) ,tachycardia occurred in 12(40%)followed
by hypotension in 8(26.6%) patients.Only 2(6.6%) patients had nausea. Flushing
and dizziness were experienced only by 1, 1 (3.3%) patients
Conclusion: Nifedipine was
better in efficacy and safety than MgSO4 and caused less side effects
Keywords: Nifedipine,
Magnesium sulphate, Preterm labour, Tocolytic therapy, Management,