Background: Regional anesthesia has increasingly expanded its role in perioperative care of patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. The use of regional anesthesia has been widely implemented among anesthesiologists and pain providers. Multiple approaches for sephanous nerve blockade have been used including nerve stimulation, anatomical landmarks and ultrasound. It has been observed in previous studies that USG ankle block is more successful as compared to conventional anatomical landmark guided nerve block; so this study was planned to get precise and reliable results regarding both techniques in our local population.

Objective: To compare the methods of surgical anesthesia of Ultrasound-guided ankle block versus conventional anatomic landmark-guided techniques in lower limb surgery under regional anesthesia.

Materials and methods: This randomized control was carried out at Department of Anesthesia Mayo Hospital Lahore. After meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria 50 patients (25 in each group ) were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using lottery method. Group A patients underwent USG ankle block while group B patients underwent conventional anatomic landmark guided ankle block.

Results: Mean age of patients was 46.96±11.578 years; 40(80%) patients were male and 10(20%) patients were females. Successful anesthesia was achieved in 42 (84%) patients; in which in USG block group the successful anesthesia was achieved in 22(88%) patients and in ALG block group successful anesthesia was achieved in 20(80%) patients (p value =0.702)

Conclusion : Findings of this study conclude that both techniques have statistically insignificant difference in terms of success rate , however USG ankle block for surgical anesthesia showed higher success rate as compared to anatomic landmark guided technique in lower limb surgery under regional anesthesia.