Comparison of Efficacy of I/V Tramadol and Bupivacaine Irrigation through Drains after Modified Radical Mastectomy
Zarqa Rani, Iqra Mushtaq, Mehreen Akram, Zahra Ishrat
3007
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe
postsurgical pain continues to be hard to manage in patients who experience
breast cancer surgery. Badly managed pain can lead to meager patient
satisfaction, prolonged hospital stay, and increased risk of complication by
analgesics, and may be a reason in the development of long-lasting pain.
Aim: To
compare the efficacy of Intravenous Tramadol and Bupivacaine irrigation through
surgical drains after Modified Radical Mastectomy in patients with carcinoma
breast.
Methods: This was a
randomized
controlled trial conducted in the Department of Anesthesia, Mayo Hospital
Lahore. Total 70 female patients aged 18-70 years
undergoing radical mastectomy for CA breast diagnosed on histopathology were
selected. Patients were divided into two groups A and B through simple random
sampling technique. Group A received intravenous Tramadol. Group B received
Bupivacaine through surgical drains.
Results: At 0, 2, 4 and 6 hour postoperatively no significant difference was seen
in severity of pain in both treatment groups. In Group-A at 0, 2, 4 and 6 hour postoperatively, 68.8%,
71.4%, 57.1% and 60% respectively had reported no pain while in Group-B at 0, 2, 4 and 6 hour postoperatively, 48.6%,
65.7%, 45.7% and 54.3% patients had reported no pain. Complaints of Nausea,
vomiting, sedation, urinary retention was higher in patients in Tramadol Group
as compared to Bupivacaine Group.
Conclusion: Results of
this study demonstrated that bupivacaine administrated through surgical drain
was equally effective as intravenous tramadol for controlling postoperative mastectomy
pain with less side effects.
Keyword: Breast
Cancer,
Acute Pain, Analgesia, Tramadol, Bupivacaine, Radical Mastectomy,
Nausea, Vomiting, Sedation, Urinary retention, Hypotension